Jump to content

Are the current producers ruining Home and Away?


JamesC10

Recommended Posts

Posted

I think the current format really set in when the River Boys arrived, yes it had problems before but I feel it still had a good community feeling. Watching a 2005 episode the other day, I found just how much more calmer H&A was just those 9 years ago. The fuzziness was adamant. I also will hold on to hope that the show improves, it will not happen overnight but I am not yet ready to accept that the current style will be the style going forward. Neighbours pulled itself out of the dark and destructive phase it went through, I am confident H&A can do the same.

I don't know if it's true. I recently took a look at the first episode of 2010 and it had harsh music, storylines about shooting and the general feeling that everything is very serious and everyone is in danger.

  • Replies 2.2k
  • Created
  • Last Reply
Posted

Some say that H&A started to become the show it is now in about 2005/2006. If so then that was 9 years ago, and that unfortunately could be an indication that the show as we know it now is going to be the show going forward. With Neighbours it was just a phase (2006-2009ish) and it managed to pull itself out from its dark and destructive phase.

Posted

Possibly, although I would be surprised if they could find a worse set of producers after Lucy and Louise.

It took over three years, a 50% drop in ratings and a channel change before Network TEN showed Susan Bower and Neil Kingston the door. But that allowed Richard Jasek and Alan Hardy to come in and turn the show around with probably very little interference from TEN. And they turned it around very quickly.

The difference with H&A is that Lucy and Louise are in the twilight of a successful (ratings-wise) period, and they're sticking with it through the departure of the Braxton's. Hopefully they stick around for another year or two until the ratings are really in the toilet, at which point Network 7 might hire some decent talent that understands the soap opera genre.

I remember people commenting how bad the show was before the current producers came along, so there's no guarantee the next producers will actually improve things either. But it can't possibly get much worse surely, It will be interesting to see if the ratings hold up in the post-Braxton-dominated era. I can see them trying something even more OTT before they would resort to the formula that worked for the first 17 or 18 years. These days if the format is delivering ratings, I can't see them risking that by altering it, so it will be business as usual until ratings fall to an extent that the network is not making so much of a profit from advertising etc.

The new characters who have come in over the past months haven't really set the screen alight in my opinion. Barely a week goes by now when there isn't some kind of life-or-death scenario. It's bound to get tired sooner or later. It may as well be a completely different show just with the name "Home and Away".

Posted

It is practically The Braxton Show now, regarding the show feeling like a new show. I did hear that Lucy worked under Cameron Welsh and he was someone who started this new format of crimes and endless love triangles. But regarding the big bosses at Channel 7, there is no room for quality as far as they are concerned as long as the show is making them much profit. I am not sure if Lucy and Louise are completely ruining H&A for new fans but for the longer term viewers they probably are ruining the show.

Posted

I tuned in yesterday, and within 5 minutes, Kyle was aggressively pinning a guy down on the pool table. Boring and yawn. Everytime I try to watch it its the same. The show has not developed in years Just goes round and round in cirlces. Yes, the show is ruined. Who's fault it is I dont exactly know and whether or not it will be fixed one day remains to be seen.

At least before it always felt like it was going somewhere.

Posted

It's a fair point that probably many of those who have been watching the series only for the past 5 years or less, would think the current Summer Bay antics are just great.

The longer they stick to the format, in theory, the more of the audience who will identify with it, then it will get to the point where they couldn't go back since they'd lose the current audience. Creating high drama by having aggressive one-dimensional characters, and keeping everyone else happy with endless love triangles and "Who's the father?" type storylines shows a real lack of imagination. Concentrating on certain characters they see as "viewer favourites" and sidelining others,

I agree, it is stuck in a rut, just going around in circles these days. Viewers are fickle and bound to get bored eventually. High drama that used to shock and entrall us years ago just becomes run-of-the-mill. It will be interesting to see where we are in a few years time...

Posted

When H&A first began it was a breath of fresh air and due to the location, had many more location scenes than Neighbours did and more locations were featured, it had a much sunnier feel to it than Neighbours which was still a bit twee. In 1988 H&A had a great location and good quality, in 2014 the quality is low even if the nice location is there. I think Neighbours is now out of the ratings battle so can do what it likes whereas H&A relies on big ratings and has to have high drama. I think they may bring in a new criminal family when the Braxton domination dies down, perhaps as a rival to Andy or something.

Posted

This discussion keeps going round in circles. Bottom line is for the folks who can't stand to watch it, Home and Away has been ruined by the producers (and writers). Bottom line is for the folks who can only watch a bit of it then it has been ruined.

There is no way of going back in time and fixing things. If they did the Fletcher's or the Sunderland's or the Hunter storylines again then that would just be a repeat of what has already been seen and it wouldn't please everyone anyway.

When the Braxton's leave they will be replaced with similar characters because of their popularity with a certain demographic of fans. If enough people shout that they want something then why should writers or producers change anything? The storylines and casting of characters are going to repeat until they eventually realise that they've backed themselves into a corner. Those that really care for the show will have moved on by then along with transient viewers who have only tuned in for specific actors.

Posted

In that case I might as well switch off watching any more future episodes of H&A for good and just concentrate on the now golden soap, Neighbours. To finish off, I dont like what the producers have done to the show that was once my fave show in my schooldays in the late 1980s and 1990s.

Posted

Switch off then.

Or you know, fight for it. Write to the Producers and the Network and tell THEM what you want from Home and Away ... and WHY. Tell them how you can't watch any more crime stories. That it is a soap and even if they do things in moderation it can still be dramatic. Start a survey and get proper statistics to back up your views.

Get together with others who feel like you do, or just want things to change and start a revolution... Use social media to express what is going on and see how many join in... Be polite, be concise and give reasons.

Or.... just switch off.

But if you choose to switch off be prepared for people to label you disloyal ... a Braxton-hater.... and other things.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.