j.laur5 Posted October 24, 2019 Report Posted October 24, 2019 On 14/10/2019 at 00:14, EndlessSummer said: Agreed I think if they were to bring back Sally she would be just used as Alf's second in demand, unless they actually create family oriented meaningful storylines. If Sally were to return they would need to bring back Pippa Jr as Sally is her only caregiver. As Pippa would be aged 15 (approx) she would become friends with Ryder and Bella. Although I would have to agree a return stint for Pippa Sr is long overdue as it is hard to belief her last appearance was 11 years ago! But with H&A's dramatic storylines I agree with Debra Lawrence, the character of Pippa wouldn't fit in as the bay has too much drama. Its actually ten years since Pippa's last appearance. The show seems to have toned down bit
Trudy Heine Posted October 27, 2019 Report Posted October 27, 2019 Hope so, maybe for Irene's 60th. Also Pippas Sr and Jr and Miles/Milco
j.laur5 Posted October 27, 2019 Report Posted October 27, 2019 5 minutes ago, Trudy Heine said: Hope so, maybe for Irene's 60th. Also Pippas Sr and Jr and Miles/Milco I think Irene already had her 60th!.
Homeandawayfan. Posted October 27, 2019 Report Posted October 27, 2019 Yes that ship sailed in 2013 I think. Irene was born 1953, AFAIK.
c120701 Posted October 29, 2019 Report Posted October 29, 2019 Alf’s 70 next year, isn’t he? We could have had a joint 40th for Sally, Miles & Leah this year as they’re all February 1979 babies.
j.laur5 Posted October 29, 2019 Report Posted October 29, 2019 3 minutes ago, c120701 said: Alf’s 70 next year, isn’t he? We could have had a joint 40th for Sally, Miles & Leah this year as they’re all February 1979 babies. Nope he was 70 in 2015.
Homeandawayfan. Posted October 29, 2019 Report Posted October 29, 2019 Which involved in him being de-aged by 2 years or so. I hope we can see Sally again one day, you never know. Never say never as Ross Kemp always says to an EE return.
Red Ranger 1 Posted October 30, 2019 Report Posted October 30, 2019 7 hours ago, Homeandawayfan. said: Which involved in him being de-aged by 2 years or so. It was 10 years after his 60th birthday, that means he was de-aged by 0 years. The ages given in the early years didn't tend to match anyway.
Homeandawayfan. Posted October 31, 2019 Report Posted October 31, 2019 On 30/10/2019 at 00:07, Red Ranger 1 said: It was 10 years after his 60th birthday, that means he was de-aged by 0 years. The ages given in the early years didn't tend to match anyway. Sorry I was getting confused, it was his 60th in 2005 when slightly went against his age in 1988 which he said.
c120701 Posted October 31, 2019 Report Posted October 31, 2019 On 29/10/2019 at 09:28, j.laur5 said: Nope he was 70 in 2015. Ah, yes I didn’t do my maths quite right, I was trying to work 65, then 70 and added 10 on to the sje
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.